Skip to content
Orvenant
Orvenant

Quality & security practices

Quality is a set of checks, not a badge.

We scope quality and security work around the product's risks, users and operating environment. The acceptance plan should explain what will be checked and what remains outside it.

Test the journeys that matter

A quality plan begins with the decisions a customer or employee needs to make, not a target number of test cases. We identify the important journeys, the information each person may see and the failures that would cause harm or lost work. Acceptance criteria describe observable behavior: what happens on success, on a bad input and when a connected service is unavailable.

Control access and changes

Permissions belong at the record and action level. A hidden button cannot protect another customer’s data, and a shared administrator login cannot explain who approved a change. The project plan should cover role-specific access, private credentials, review of sensitive changes and a release route that can be traced. The depth of review follows the information and operations actually in scope.

Plan for operation

A launch is not the end of a service’s risk. Monitoring should point to a person and a practical response. Backups need defined coverage and a way to test restoration; an automated success message does not prove that the data can be recovered. We discuss update ownership, incident communication and what to do when a dependency fails before handing over a live system.

State the limits

Each proposal should name the checks it includes and what remains outside them. A security review, penetration test, legal assessment and formal certification are different activities; this page claims none of those results. If your procurement process requires a specific control or report, bring it into the scope discussion early so the acceptance evidence can be agreed before development starts.

Questions before we start.

Do you guarantee that an application will have no security defects?

No honest provider can guarantee that. We can define threat-relevant checks, access tests, dependency review and operational controls for the agreed scope, then document their results and limits. Continuing updates and incident response also need an owner after release.

Can you work within our security requirements?

Share the applicable requirements and the system boundaries during scoping. We can map them to design, implementation and evidence tasks, and identify any specialist assessment or external approval that must be arranged separately.

A DIRECT CONVERSATION

Bring us the problem. We’ll work through the next step.

Share what exists today and what you want to change. We can discuss the scope, dependencies and a practical way forward.

Privacy settings

Optional Google Analytics measures page visits and contact-option use. Rejecting keeps Analytics off. Accepting allows analytics cookies. Advertising features stay off, and enquiry contents and contact details are not sent to Analytics.

Withdrawing stops future collection and removes this site’s accessible Analytics cookies. It does not erase information already received by Google. Privacy notice · Cookie notice