Technical SEO

Remove the technical obstacles between your site and search.

Technical SEO for crawlability, indexation, page structure and performance. Turn audit findings into changes that developers can implement and verify.

Discuss your project

Fix the source of a search problem.

A crawler may report hundreds of URLs, yet one template, redirect rule or CMS setting causes most of the trouble. We trace problems from a valuable page back to the system that produced it. That makes the work practical for developers and editors: fix the rule once, verify its effect and keep the same mistake from returning with the next release.

An engineering brief with a way to verify it.

The audit starts with priority journeys and the site's actual publishing architecture, not a generic warning count.

Crawl and index paths

Review status codes, robots rules, canonical URLs, XML sitemaps and internal links together. Identify which pages should be discoverable and which should deliberately remain private.

View SEO services

Template and rendering review

Inspect metadata, page headings, mobile content, structured data and any JavaScript dependency that affects visible information. Check page performance where it changes a user's experience.

Read the guide: Lighthouse and real-user website performance

Implementation proof

Prioritize a fix by affected pages and business relevance, then compare test and published output. Keep before-and-after URLs and checks so the outcome can be reviewed.

Follow one error from report to release.

If an important service page has an unexpected canonical, we inspect its template, CMS data and redirects before changing a tag. A proposed fix is tested against related pages and other locales. After deployment we fetch the public response, confirm the final URL and check the source report again. This matters during redesigns, when seemingly small routing decisions can affect many pages at once.

Technical access is a foundation, not a result guarantee.

A valid sitemap does not force indexing, and structured data does not promise a rich result. Search engines make those decisions. Useful content, truthful business information and page experience still matter. When a recommendation depends on server, CMS or third-party access, the responsible owner and implementation limit belong in the plan.

Give the next release a repeatable check.

The handover includes prioritized issues, changed rules, verification URLs and monitoring tasks. Developers can use the checks in future builds; editors can see which content fields affect search presentation. For URL changes across a site, read our search migration service before the cutover plan is fixed.

Some of the teams we have worked with.

Across talent, fitness, mobility, payments and local commerce.

RandstadClassPassVeezuRushpaySupport Black Owned

Questions before we start.

Will fixing every crawler warning improve rankings?

No. Warnings differ in impact, and some describe intentional behavior. We prioritize issues affecting useful pages and real visitors, then verify the implemented change. A high issue count alone is not a business case for a fix.

Can technical SEO be done without changing the website?

An audit can be read-only, but correcting the underlying cause often requires a template, CMS, redirect or hosting change. We separate findings from implementation and agree who owns each change before release.

EXPLORE

Continue exploring

Guide

A DIRECT CONVERSATION

Bring us the problem. We’ll work through the next step.

Share what exists today and what you want to change. We can discuss the scope, dependencies and a practical way forward.